I had seen this video for awhile and the confusing title pushed it to the back of my watch later list, but like most others things like that, I wish I had made the time for it earlier.
The title, ‘No Forests on Flat Earth,’ should probably be more like the title of this entry, as it more accurately conveys the message the author of the vid is trying to make. Note that the narrator sounds like a Russian-native so his grammar/annunciation isn’t all that great, so I recommend turning on the subtitles.
So, there are a lot of dots that this one connected for me, and oddly I had randomly looked up things like the Basalt ribs on cliffs and mountains in random places around the world, along with giant human sculptures on distant coasts.
Also having been in South Africa last year, flying over most of the African continent, staying in Cape Town at the base of Table Mtn, this was my first big travel after having started research Flat Earth topics so I was trying to keep an eye out for things that begged to be questioned.
Having already known that there are various “table” mountains all over the world, I already had my suspicions that either very few or none of them were naturally occurring, but I hadn’t made the direct connection to all plateaus being included. There are other theories of how the landscape can electrically formed due to the nature of the Earth being a circuit connector between the sky and ground by Michael Steinbacher, so there are still a few things to consider perhaps. But I question his research as well since it has yet to be witnessed on a large scale outside of the lab.
But just watching this and taking the journey with our narrator, I couldn’t help but be hit by that familiar feeling of the story ringing true. The visuals are so strong.
To me this theory is 100% plausible.
If mountain ranges and formations and plateaus are the corpses of our true environment – that might explain why some of us are so enamored with rocks and crystals, (me!) or why we all get this really romantic, nostalgia type feeling around big trees.
tl;dw
There used to be giant silicon-based trees all over Earth.
All mountain ranges are broken or ground down tree stumps.
All plateaus are stumps of cut trees.
No such thing as rocks, all remnants of these trees. Petrified wood is all from these silicon trees, as normal wood trees cannot be transmuted into gemstone.
Salt flats and deserts may be the sawdust from the felling of these huge silicon trees (White Sands + Bonneville Salt Flats and Great Salt Lake, Tibet and Gobi desert)
Volcanoes are the permanent waste piles of whatever other agents were used in the process (felling, processing, who knows what else).
The World Tree and the North Pole
The subject is at the same time amazing, and also monumentally depressing and disheartening.
WHO THE FUCK WOULD DO THAT? AND WHY? AND HOW?
Who convinced the rest of us that this was permissible?
Or did they never even bother to ask and just do it unilaterally?
Where is the biggest tree we know should be at the North Pole, the World Tree that so many cultures refer to in their cosmologies?
It’s that last question that is the worst.
We cut down the World Tree, Mt Meru?
….ARE you kidding me? Please say it ain’t so.
Greenland
So, after rattling around in my head for a week, and even before this week’s DTRH, I had the thought of where would the World Tree have been. There’s very little even in the Flat Earth research about the nature of the North Pole, so part of me assumed that on satellite and maps that it’s being hidden from us similar to the Antarctica smudge zone.
Then I happened upon a picture of Greenland and I remember and old video from Project Camelot interviewing a Russian scientist Valery Uvarov. Uvarov has built many actual large scale modern pyramids all over Russia. He once had a webiste up that had step-by-step pictures and captions of a total construction, which I will post if i can find it. Below is video about the Pyramid Community project he assists with in Russia.
The reason I thought of him was in that interview, he said he postulated that Mt. Meru was possibly situated somewhere on the East coast of Greenland, and that he was planning on going there soon after.
But factoring in the fact that Mt. Meru may have been much more than just a obscenely tall mountain and was actually a huge tree, possibly the first and largest (and arguably most important) one, could it be that the whole of Greenland, glacier-covered mountains from coast to coast, in the frozen stump of the World Tree?
http://www.greenland.com/en/things-to-do/outdoor-activities/hiking-in-greenland/
Following this link, fun facts on the sidebar actual confirm one thing right off the bat:
“East Greenland has the tallest mountains in Greenland. The tallest is near Ittoqqortoormiit, called Gunnbjørn Fjeld (3700 meters).”
Do the Giants factor in?
Giant “something” factors is for sure. The scale of such an operation begs all the questions; where is all the huge equipment? where is all the stone? yeah we have a lot of structures from antiquity made of impossibly-shapen stone, but not nearly the amount that would account for all the Great Trees.
The narrator doesn’t really go into that part, most likely because there’s a fair bit of speculation of that, but I think it’s worthy of following up.
Did whoever it was take all that Tree Stone to Antarctica, or even past it to potential lands beyond? Or maybe there is some vast underground culture that still exists that helped with this?
I think these factors make the subject a good one for remote viewing, both into the past and present, for answers.
India, the Ancients, Eden and the North Pole
http://www.viewzone.com/edenpole.html
This lengthy article goes into how the Indians actually preserved the culture of Eden instead of their own. I haven’t finished it yet, but I think there are some gems in here to find related to this subject.
There is also a heap of information being shared on facebook regarding Greenland right now, so I’m anxious to see what other dots connect.
Any comments are more than welcome!
Endless Realm 